Perhaps the reason behind the unexplained process being unexplainable is that the finishing, or fulfillment of the process is the freedom from want/ or need of explanation.
From a skewed vision of this perspective the process itself is one that defies systematization-not out of sheer defiance or snobbery-but because the process has a transcendental quality in which reason (discernment) is bypassed in the surface of becoming free.
While this may seem contradictory, i believe that it is only a contradiction of our basics assumption and notions that have been philosophized into our society. If this is so, then thought itself is a theory that, as we've done the math so to speak, boils down to "the process to complicated to explain" being the remainder; The extra number dragging out that disallows x from equaling zero, creating a constant repeating decimal to infinity. We approach the situation with this discernment and what we do is create a never ending remainder that continues until the end of time-but this is not to say that when something is decided it cannot be taken back. In fact the letting go of a though itself seems to be the dropping of a created process to complicated to explain. Time itself is as allusive as the Process to complicated to explain; and an escape from (a) time would and is the same thing as transcending the process. But how do we get there? Perhaps the problem is always trying to approach a situation, instead of always being the moment. Perhaps we are creating the problems by always comprehending things and thus becoming apprehensive of the similarity of repetitions in events-when instead we could find solace in just enjoying the moment-being present. Maybe then the realization manifests that we know what to do because we always knew how to react. In the present, everything is always beginning.
No comments:
Post a Comment